Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hao Xiang Shopping TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:22, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hao Xiang Shopping TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability of this shopping channel DGG ( talk ) 04:18, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:40, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Says it's the "first Chinese language shopping channel in Malaysia" and the "first shopping channel that launches on Malaysian DTT network, MYTV Broadcasting", but no sources to back those claims. Still, it's a non-notable article. — Wyliepedia 04:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a reliable source for the claims (See here), but these were self-descriptions by the company. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 08:53, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • For DTT MYTV Broadcasting, many can confirm that there is a presence of it as it was posted on MYTV Broadcasting official Facebook Page and many was able to scan it. However, since they didn't post anywhere other than Facebook, plus that the platform is still on test transmission, and Facebook sources is stated to be less reliable and somewhat cannot be used, so I can't use that source until someone can confirm that source reliablity. (PotfromKP (talk) 06:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC))[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.