Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cookie bouquet
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cookie bouquet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not pass WP:GNG, all I could find were recipes, passing mentions, and info on one particular maker of these. I don't think a merge -- in this case to Cookies by Design, which supposedly came up with the concept -- is appropriate, since the idea of a bouquet of cookies is too general to be associated with one company. (Unrelatedly, that article itself needs work, but I'm doing that now.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:00, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom, indeed does not appear to be notable. There are no specifics or minimal references to understand what exactly is meant --YouVeNeverSeenBetter (talk) 05:54, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.