Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamie Coghill
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Brandon (talk) 20:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Jamie Coghill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article about a musician that does not pass WP:BIO, and is largely unsourced. Asserts enough notability to not be a speedy candidate. Kevin (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is not completely clear if this person has made multiple albums on major independent labels. The solo work definitely does not seem notable. But, there is a big WP:COI issue in that the article author seems to be the subject of the article. Clubmarx (talk) 16:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 12:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Mega Delete. NN person. Google News shows no results, search shows nothing to make this person notable. TheWeakWilled (T * G) 15:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.