Report Supperbsonic's Profile

Just ask me.
My criteria for judging may be a little different from others so let me explain how I rate things. I don't follow or agree with MAL's score designations, such as a 5 being an average show. I do not rate equally either or try to be objective. Ratings are a form of opinion and by definition can't be objective. My enjoyment level can trump a great number of flaws and raise my score higher than the more tangible technical elements may merit. Additionally my lack of enjoyment will cause me to rate something lower for the same reasons. Don't bother arguing with me about my ratings or this system because I don't care about yours. My opinions are mine alone!

10 Exceptional and highly enjoyable
9 Great
8 Good to Very Good
7 Average to slightly above average, contains significant flaws or doesn't set itself apart from other shows
6 Average to below average. Similar to a 7 rating but has major issues I didn't like
5 Barely watchable, kept my interest and that's about it
4 Dreadfully bad, sometimes they have one or two redeeming qualities but are mostly forgettable
3 Painful to watch
2 Just kill me now
1 /slits wrists

Apparently some of you do not understand what a review is and that it is a work of criticism and not supposed to be devoid of opinions. I guess I have to define it for those of you on the short bus.

review
n review [rəˈvjuː]
1 a written report on a book, play etc giving the writer's opinion of it.

source: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/review

If you want objectivity read the encyclopedia.

I tend to not drop shows either even if they are bad. I'm either a masochist or I just don't like leaving things unfinished.