Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alternate Truck Routes in Pennsylvania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 04:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Alternate Truck Routes in Pennsylvania

Alternate Truck Routes in Pennsylvania (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD. Unsourced listcruft. These alternate truck routes can be covered in the article about the parent route. Dough4872 00:13, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - Unneeded cruft that belongs on WikiVoyage or somewhere. –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

• Delete This is an entirely unreferenced article, and a search for sources turns up very little. And sources that I can find seem to focus mostly on temporary situations: Road X has heavy traffic. Use road Y as an alternate. How about alternate car routes? Alternate motorcycle routes? How about alternate routes that cross the Pennsylvania border to adjoining states? My research led me to the conclusion that this specific topic is neither discrete, nor notable, nor encyclopedic. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Fails stand-alone list notability as a non-notable topic lacking significant coverage in independent reliable sources.  Philg88 ^♦talk 06:11, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.